The risk numbers in this tool come from studies of miners who were exposed to radon for many years and later died from lung cancer. Scientists used those results to estimate how many people out of 1,000 might die from lung cancer if they lived in a home with a certain radon level for their whole life. The EPA defines a lifetime as 70 years of breathing the same air in the same house.
A quick, level‑only interpretation of your radon result.
This tool compiles radon risk data with suggested actions based on radon levels to facilitate informed, evidence-based radon decisions.
Does anyone who lives in the home smoke?
Check any that apply:
How long have you lived here?
Do you expect to stay in the home?
Major renovations in the last 12 months?
Generated on:
Risk Tool Level: --
Interpretation Tool Level: --
Decision Tool Test Result: --
Recommendation:
--
Why:
--
Additional Notes:
--
Mitigation reduces radon by creating controlled airflow beneath your home and safely venting it outside. This is the foundation for understanding the tradeoffs in the cards that follow.
A mitigation system uses a fan and sealed piping to draw radon from beneath your home and release it outdoors, preventing it from entering your living space.
Systems are effective, long‑lasting, and work in nearly all home types. They operate continuously and require very little from the homeowner.
Understanding this basic process helps you make sense of the pros and cons in the next cards — and decide whether mitigation feels right for your home.
Mitigation is a meaningful home upgrade, and understanding typical costs helps you decide whether it feels right for your home.
Pros
Cons
If the cost feels manageable and you value long‑term peace of mind, mitigation is a strong option. If the upfront expense feels heavy right now, it’s reasonable to wait and revisit later.
Most systems reduce radon reliably, but performance depends on system design, fan placement, and contractor quality.
Pros
Cons
If you want a dependable, long‑term solution and are comfortable choosing a qualified contractor, mitigation offers strong performance. If you’re unsure about contractor quality or system complexity, it’s reasonable to pause and gather more clarity.
Fans run continuously, and placement affects how noticeable they are in daily life.
Pros
Cons
If you’re sensitive to noise, placement matters. If a faint hum is acceptable—or if the fan can be placed outside—noise is rarely a dealbreaker.
Systems need very little attention, but fans eventually wear out and require replacement.
Pros
Cons
If you’re comfortable with occasional checks and eventual fan replacement, mitigation is easy to maintain. If long‑term upkeep feels burdensome, waiting may be reasonable.